Supreme Court to review Mississippi case on exclusion of Black jurors

The Supreme Court will examine allegations of racial bias in jury selection during Terry Pitchford's capital murder trial.

Supreme Court to review Mississippi case on exclusion of Black jurors

December 16, 2025

Landon Reever

Supreme Court Takes Up Controversial Case

The Supreme Court has decided to hear a significant legal case from Mississippi regarding allegations that a prosecutor intentionally excluded Black jurors in a trial that resulted in a death sentence for an 18-year-old Black defendant.

Terry Pitchford is challenging his death sentence, which was imposed in 2006. His trial commenced with jury selection on February 6, 2006, and concluded just three days later with a verdict of capital murder.

Pitchford’s legal team has raised concerns about the jury selection process, arguing that it was marred by racial bias. They contend that during the trial, District Attorney Doug Evans utilized four out of his twelve peremptory strikes to dismiss four out of five Black potential jurors.

The petition presented to the justices highlights evidence suggesting discriminatory practices, including marked venire lists indicating race and gender. Pitchford was convicted for the murder of a grocery store clerk during an attempted robbery in 2004, alongside another individual who was a juvenile at the time.

Prosecutors have the right to exclude jurors based on valid reasons or through peremptory challenges; however, these challenges cannot be used discriminatorily against individuals based on race, gender, or religion.

This isn’t the first time the Supreme Court has addressed issues related to this prosecutor. In 2019, they reviewed another case involving claims that Evans had excluded a Black juror from a different death-row inmate’s jury.

Burl Cain, commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, is named as the defendant in this case. The state argues against Pitchford’s appeal by stating that previous rulings by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals were unfavorable to him and asserting that his arguments lack merit.

The case titled Terry Pitchford v. Burl Cain will be heard early next year, with a decision anticipated by late June.

Edited by:

Landon Reever

Photo of author
I cover economic policy, markets, and labor trends, focusing on how national decisions impact daily life. My reporting aims to translate complex data into clear, practical understanding.

Leave a Comment